<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AdamAbrams.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamabrams.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamabrams.com</link>
	<description>Info, pics, video and more from Adam.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Jonathan Goldstein and &#8220;Wiretap&#8221; Live in Vancouver by KF</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2614/comment-page-1#comment-28423</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2614#comment-28423</guid>
		<description>Mr. Jonathon Goldstein must surely be the most annoying comic genius working in Canada in the 21st century. May we only pray the suits and rednecks do not change him, whether by pen or by hunting knife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Jonathon Goldstein must surely be the most annoying comic genius working in Canada in the 21st century. May we only pray the suits and rednecks do not change him, whether by pen or by hunting knife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Face to face with Stephen Colbert in the &#8216;Couv! by Charles</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2598/comment-page-1#comment-28353</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2598#comment-28353</guid>
		<description>Terrific write up, Adam. I had thought about going, but lacked your patience. I&#039;m glad you were rewarded! A moose and a maple leaf? Perfect.

Charles
www.facebook.com/pages/City-Opera-Vancouver/297764267658?ref=ts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific write up, Adam. I had thought about going, but lacked your patience. I&#8217;m glad you were rewarded! A moose and a maple leaf? Perfect.</p>
<p>Charles<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/City-Opera-Vancouver/297764267658?ref=ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/pages/City-Opera-Vancouver/297764267658?ref=ts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Face to face with Stephen Colbert in the &#8216;Couv! by Stephen Colbert in the Zeitgeist &#8211; Vancouver Super Spoiler Edition :: No Fact Zone</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2598/comment-page-1#comment-28341</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Colbert in the Zeitgeist &#8211; Vancouver Super Spoiler Edition :: No Fact Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2598#comment-28341</guid>
		<description>[...] taping reports from Day 2 at Creekside Park: here, with video and pics (and the video is probably the best spectator video I&#8217;ve seen from either day); here, with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taping reports from Day 2 at Creekside Park: here, with video and pics (and the video is probably the best spectator video I&#8217;ve seen from either day); here, with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Face to face with Stephen Colbert in the &#8216;Couv! by Eileen - Mother of the groom</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2598/comment-page-1#comment-28334</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen - Mother of the groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2598#comment-28334</guid>
		<description>Adam

Thanks for a wonderful video of the event.

Hugs

Momma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam</p>
<p>Thanks for a wonderful video of the event.</p>
<p>Hugs</p>
<p>Momma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now it can be told: our moving day from hell (and the heavenly heroes who saved us) by Peggy</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/1713/comment-page-1#comment-27973</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=1713#comment-27973</guid>
		<description>Adam, Chris! here we are in Las Vegas, we don&#039;t gamble, it&#039;s too cold to sun tan and eating is out because we are recovering from the stomach flu and the most marvelous entertainment comes. Your Moving Day!
Love Mom and Dad.
PS I kept saying &quot; Christine you needed your Dad&quot; and when the stove needed cleaning,  &quot; Christine and Adam, you needed your Mom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, Chris! here we are in Las Vegas, we don&#8217;t gamble, it&#8217;s too cold to sun tan and eating is out because we are recovering from the stomach flu and the most marvelous entertainment comes. Your Moving Day!<br />
Love Mom and Dad.<br />
PS I kept saying &#8221; Christine you needed your Dad&#8221; and when the stove needed cleaning,  &#8221; Christine and Adam, you needed your Mom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Last Five Years &#8211; A musical about love, backwards and forwards by Bryant Costello</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/965/comment-page-1#comment-27958</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryant Costello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=965#comment-27958</guid>
		<description>He looks a little like Zac Efron and she looks a little like Amanda Bynnes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He looks a little like Zac Efron and she looks a little like Amanda Bynnes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At long last&#8230; our wedding photos! by Eileen - Mother of the groom</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2316/comment-page-1#comment-27874</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen - Mother of the groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2316#comment-27874</guid>
		<description>I must share this with all who will read this.  I am a very lucky woman, as I have the most wonderful daughter-in-law (honorary daughter) I could have hoped to  get.
She is thoughtful and very kind, and my son Adam &amp; Christine are a perfect match.

With love

Momma Eileen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must share this with all who will read this.  I am a very lucky woman, as I have the most wonderful daughter-in-law (honorary daughter) I could have hoped to  get.<br />
She is thoughtful and very kind, and my son Adam &amp; Christine are a perfect match.</p>
<p>With love</p>
<p>Momma Eileen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At long last&#8230; our wedding photos! by Charles</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2316/comment-page-1#comment-27872</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2316#comment-27872</guid>
		<description>Strangely, all I remember is chocolate cake and red spots dancing in my eyes.


xoxo, you two,


Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely, all I remember is chocolate cake and red spots dancing in my eyes.</p>
<p>xoxo, you two,</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with theatre posters by Gil Jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2498/comment-page-1#comment-27783</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Jaysmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2498#comment-27783</guid>
		<description>Tag lines can be amusing, and a well-designed poster is all very nice, but the movie industry has known for decades that what gets people to come to see something is a trailer. If you want to know what an album&#039;s like, you can hear a single from it on the radio, or thirty-second clips on Amazon. For most games you can get a demo, for free.

But plays? Nothing. You can have a paragraph of text, if you&#039;re lucky, and maybe you can trust in the reputation of the playwright, if they&#039;re sufficiently famous that you&#039;ve even heard of them. (A fun party game: &quot;Quick! Name ten living playwrights.&quot;)

What I want is more video clips of plays and musicals online.

For very short-run shows, especially where costumes aren&#039;t worn and the show isn&#039;t in the theatre until the last moment, okay, it could be difficult. But for anything even remotely professional, please, why can&#039;t you post something online showing me even sixty seconds of the play, even thirty seconds, to give me a taste of its visual and dynamic style and of how the actors perform.

I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I&#039;ve seen this done: once on the Playhouse Theatre&#039;s website, where a clip from &quot;Studies In Motion&quot; clinched our ticket sales, and once for each nomination for &quot;Best Play&quot; at the Tonys last year, where again I was able to think &quot;Whoa, those look good&quot;.

Without that, I&#039;m sorry, but it&#039;s just very difficult to persuade myself to go see a play, no matter how good it says it is - like any poster will ever mutter under its breath, &quot;Eh, this play is okay, I guess, for people who like that kind of thing.&quot; In England in the 80s there was a joke to the effect that all plays described themselves on their posters with the tagline &quot;Searing indictment... savage critique... Thatcher&#039;s Britain&quot;. Well, yes, that was a very populous category of play, but it&#039;s not exactly very informative, is it?

For people who just generally like plays, of course, this information isn&#039;t necessary. But advertising and marketing aren&#039;t supposed to influence people who are already interested in your product. It&#039;s supposed to make yours truly - casually interested in theatre if it&#039;s likely to be a good use of my time - turn his head and say &quot;Whoa! That looks interesting! I must see that!&quot; And a piece of static graphic art is not, in my view, the right medium for advertising a stage play.

I&#039;m pretty sure, from my limited experience in show production, that there would be copyright issues with this, which can&#039;t be solved by my waving my hand and saying that copyright holders should wake up and smell the coffee. But they should. It&#039;s 2010: get a website and put clips on it, or I&#039;m not coming. I have spoken ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tag lines can be amusing, and a well-designed poster is all very nice, but the movie industry has known for decades that what gets people to come to see something is a trailer. If you want to know what an album&#8217;s like, you can hear a single from it on the radio, or thirty-second clips on Amazon. For most games you can get a demo, for free.</p>
<p>But plays? Nothing. You can have a paragraph of text, if you&#8217;re lucky, and maybe you can trust in the reputation of the playwright, if they&#8217;re sufficiently famous that you&#8217;ve even heard of them. (A fun party game: &#8220;Quick! Name ten living playwrights.&#8221;)</p>
<p>What I want is more video clips of plays and musicals online.</p>
<p>For very short-run shows, especially where costumes aren&#8217;t worn and the show isn&#8217;t in the theatre until the last moment, okay, it could be difficult. But for anything even remotely professional, please, why can&#8217;t you post something online showing me even sixty seconds of the play, even thirty seconds, to give me a taste of its visual and dynamic style and of how the actors perform.</p>
<p>I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I&#8217;ve seen this done: once on the Playhouse Theatre&#8217;s website, where a clip from &#8220;Studies In Motion&#8221; clinched our ticket sales, and once for each nomination for &#8220;Best Play&#8221; at the Tonys last year, where again I was able to think &#8220;Whoa, those look good&#8221;.</p>
<p>Without that, I&#8217;m sorry, but it&#8217;s just very difficult to persuade myself to go see a play, no matter how good it says it is &#8211; like any poster will ever mutter under its breath, &#8220;Eh, this play is okay, I guess, for people who like that kind of thing.&#8221; In England in the 80s there was a joke to the effect that all plays described themselves on their posters with the tagline &#8220;Searing indictment&#8230; savage critique&#8230; Thatcher&#8217;s Britain&#8221;. Well, yes, that was a very populous category of play, but it&#8217;s not exactly very informative, is it?</p>
<p>For people who just generally like plays, of course, this information isn&#8217;t necessary. But advertising and marketing aren&#8217;t supposed to influence people who are already interested in your product. It&#8217;s supposed to make yours truly &#8211; casually interested in theatre if it&#8217;s likely to be a good use of my time &#8211; turn his head and say &#8220;Whoa! That looks interesting! I must see that!&#8221; And a piece of static graphic art is not, in my view, the right medium for advertising a stage play.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure, from my limited experience in show production, that there would be copyright issues with this, which can&#8217;t be solved by my waving my hand and saying that copyright holders should wake up and smell the coffee. But they should. It&#8217;s 2010: get a website and put clips on it, or I&#8217;m not coming. I have spoken ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with theatre posters by Brian</title>
		<link>http://adamabrams.com/archives/2498/comment-page-1#comment-27782</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamabrams.com/?p=2498#comment-27782</guid>
		<description>Great post, Adam.

I agree with what you&#039;re saying. I feel everything - posters, logos, etc helps to tell the play&#039;s story, and some designs are not very good at doing that. (though some are visually very nice)

I remember seeing posters for &quot;Mom&#039;s the Word&quot; when I was in Vancouver in October and only sort of got what it was about when I saw other artwork on the actual theater on Granville Island where it was playing. I do like the Don Juan poster since it has enough elements to give you an idea of characters, time and setting, as does &quot;Mrs. Dexter&quot; to a simpler extent.

I would say use the tag line - they&#039;re used for a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Adam.</p>
<p>I agree with what you&#8217;re saying. I feel everything &#8211; posters, logos, etc helps to tell the play&#8217;s story, and some designs are not very good at doing that. (though some are visually very nice)</p>
<p>I remember seeing posters for &#8220;Mom&#8217;s the Word&#8221; when I was in Vancouver in October and only sort of got what it was about when I saw other artwork on the actual theater on Granville Island where it was playing. I do like the Don Juan poster since it has enough elements to give you an idea of characters, time and setting, as does &#8220;Mrs. Dexter&#8221; to a simpler extent.</p>
<p>I would say use the tag line &#8211; they&#8217;re used for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
